Chained to the Old Oak Tree

This is a fictional story I wrote for a club contest. I didn't win so I thought I'd post it to get your comments to improve it.

Chained to the Old Oak Tree

It’s been years since I visited Grandpa’s farm. Nothing much ever changes there, in southern Missouri, so it’s likely still the same. An oak tree stood on the back of the property, down by the river. It seemed to touch the clouds. The trunk so big it took three of us with stretched out arms to reach around the base, just barely touching our fingertips. The branches were muscular looking, like biceps of a bodybuilder. Initials were carved on many of the branches and the trunk, which was the most interesting thing about the tree. An old rusty chain was wrapped around the trunk with a keyed padlock. Not a new padlock but one you might find in an antique shop with the kind of lock that used a skeleton key.

I often asked Gramps about the chain, hoping to hear an exciting tale, which I did, but he told me a different story every time. The first thing I did when we arrived for a visit was rush down to the oak tree looking for clues about the chain and the purpose it served -- an intriguing mystery that would ultimately lead me to a hidden passion.

When I turned eleven, I received a camera for my birthday. I took many pictures of the Oak tree, the carvings, the chain and the padlock from different angles to study later. My curious mind wasn’t happy with unanswered questions or unfinished puzzles. The chain had a history, dark and disturbing tales involving slaves, Indians, and criminals; all believable but none verified. My imagination was untethered trying to fill in the holes of this mystery.

The stories I heard, and local newspaper articles I read, spoke of slaves and Indians. Shackled to this gigantic tree after working sixteen hours in the field. There were no beds and minimal food. The chain was woven through the shackles securing their feet to the tree. They could lie on the hard ground or sit up facing the tree. The tree had carvings about two feet high that circled around the trunk. Slaves carved their lives into the mighty oak, maybe to pass the time or a journal of their pain? These weren’t the typical carvings of sweethearts one might expect, but etched into the tree were stick figures hauling logs, working in the fields. There were many carvings, some too deteriorated to recognize and others too disturbing for comprehension by an eleven-year-old. Those carvings showed beatings and whippings of slaves and Indians. The oak tree was a memoir of times past, times never to be forgotten, never to be relived.

***

One Full Hand was his name, more a description than a name, but that's what they called him. Branded as a criminal, he worked in the field, by himself with a guard to watch over him. "Mean as they come" the term law-abiding folks used. His right hand was missing, no one knew why and too afraid to ask. One Full Hand didn't speak. Either he couldn't, or he chose not to, he only grunted. After the workday ended, they shackled his hand to his leg, laid him face down, then chained him to the old oak. It took three guards. When bound to the tree, he was alone. His captors didn't believe in compassion; they didn't want to clean up the bloody mess he would create.

An American Indian, One Full Hand grew up in the Osage tribe. His birth name, Achak, meant spirit. When he reached the age of reason, he was given the tribal name Spirit Painter because of his talent. He painted animal skins, headdresses, jewelry, pottery, and carvings. The tribe honored and recognized Achak for his ability. He traveled to big cities selling his paintings and promoting his tribe.

Times were good, too good. Accused of a crime, he didn't commit against a woman, just a young girl. He wasn't guilty, but . . . an Indian. No one believed him to be innocent. He was found guilty on the charge of molesting a woman. Without representation, he had no chance. Sentencing was different in those days. There were options other than jail. The punishment for Spirit Painter was cutting off the offending hand, his painting hand.

Many didn’t live through the trauma of losing a hand, he did. For him, his life was over. His talent had been taken with his hand. He grew bitter and mean. Times got bad, very bad. Trouble followed him wherever he traveled. Drunken bar fights and nights in jail, then finally he found himself chained to a tree. He was Spirit Painter no longer; people called him One Full Hand.

He worked the fields and spoke to no one. Angry at life he wanted nothing to do with people. He noticed the carvings on the tree, they showed the life of a slave, and he knew they suffered as much as he.

One morning when the sun was high in the sky, the guards were few and very distracted. An opportunity to escape presented itself. No words were needed between One Full Hand and the slaves. Their instincts took over. Shovels and picks wielded by the captives, shots fired by the guards, with many injuries, but the guards succumbed.

Their lives were different, the Indian and slaves, but also the same in many ways. Now they were free with a dark memory to share. They went their separate ways to start a new life. The canvas was Spirit Painters medium; painting was his talent, part of his past, but not his future. One Full Hand needed a new passion to drive his life forward. Paper became his medium. He wrote stories about his past to heal his emotional wounds. The more he wrote, the more passionate he became about exposing his struggles. Writing had become his new passion, and people took notice. It didn't make him wealthy, but he made a living, supported by his people. Most important was the impact he had by exposing the truth. He no longer was called One Full Hand. His name was now Spirit Writer, how fitting. He wrote about life's tragedies and dreams, until the day he died. On his tombstone, a small inscription read, “Spirit Writer recorded his life and dreams, enlightening the world.”

***

The tree never released all the chained mysteries from the past, but I discovered a remarkable thing chained to the tree—my curiosity. Putting words to paper can be powerful and liberating.

Verbal Crucifixion

     I learned at a very young age that attacking someone verbally is as damaging as physically. When you verbally attack someone they will likely attack back, as would anyone with an ounce of self-respect. There are only two viable choices fight or flee. Unfortunately, in today’s world verbal attacks are commonplace. People are verbally crucified if their opinion differs from another's. These attacks come from the news media, Hollywood celebrities, politicians and most importantly the public.
     You may be against what the Republicans stand for or in total support, but the facts haven’t changed Donald Trump was elected to the Presidential office. You may feel Hillary Clinton should have won the election, but she didn’t.
     I don’t agree with all the decisions made in the last two years but in truth I don’t agree with all the decisions made in the last seventy years. Throughout the years both parties have done some good and some bad but we elected them. No one is perfect, neither political party is perfect. This is not a perfect world.
     Verbal attacks don’t work, just look around. When has someone being verbally attacked said, “Oh! You’re right, why didn’t I know that.” Never, the answer is never.
     As a young child I heard an old proverb, “You catch more flies with honey than vinegar.” We seem to have forgotten that simple advice. We adults have become a bad example to our children. We have forgotten the basic rule of life, “Treat others as you would like to be treated.” It starts with us to set a better example for our children. They are the future generation.
     This is not to say we should never disagree with others but do it intelligently and respectful.  Hateful verbal comments toward another person won’t get you the desired results, despite your social status in life. Posting hateful or false statements about others on the Internet is a verbal attack. “Just Saying....”

Being Offended . . . Is it a Choice?

     So many people become offended by others. The truth is you can’t offend anyone, unless they allow you to offend them. That’s crazy talk. You can’t control if you’re offended. Actually you can. We make thousands of decisions/choices everyday. You control your own destiny by your choices. If you turn over your power to choose, to others they control your destiny. No matter what anyone says you have a choice; to be offended or not be offended. After all they’re just words, not stones they’re throwing. If you choose not to be offended you take control of your emotions.
     Most people struggle with this concept. It’s easy to forget that you have the power to choose. I’ve done it often. I wonder what the world would be like if we all chose not to be offended. Here’s what I imagine. Insults would slowly disappear, because there would be no point. People who insult others are looking for a reaction, but if they are ignored, they lose.
     I agree it is unreasonable to expect everyone to do what I’ve suggested. It’s also likely that the harasser will seek other ways to offend people. This post isn’t about people harassing you. It’s about how you react to verbal harassments and it’s not foolproof. I’m simply suggesting that your choices can have a positive affect on your life. When I was young the term ‘grow a thick skin’ was often used by parents which meant don’t let others negative comments take over your life.
     It’s nearly impossible to traverse life without hearing words that may offend your personal beliefs. Sometimes these need to be challenged but more often than not they can be ignored. It’s your choice.  “Just Saying . . . ?”

Are People Really that Bad?

     If you believe the news, whether it’s on Facebook, national news or some magazine it’s depressing. You’re led to believe the world is filled with scumbags. There’s no denying that this world has it’s fair share, but I believe there are far more good people. The thing is good people doing good deeds or just living an upstanding life aren’t news worthy. Well, except for three minutes on Friday night when the national news has an uplifting story.
     People put most of the blame on TV news, but that would be a mistake because social media sites publish news all day long. The problem with that is people can post virtually anything without being monitored, so there’s a lot of fake news. To call it fake news is mild, because much of it is just outright lies.
     It would be impossible for Facebook, Twitter, YouYube, or any of the hundreds of other sites to protect against the many fake news post made on a daily basis. It doesn’t take a cyber expert to make fake news post look legit but just because it looks legitimate doesn’t mean it is. The main purpose of these fake post is to get a click or even better a share which promotes the lies.
     To be honest, I’m not always sure which stories are true and which ones are false, so I rarely click or share them. Even the heartfelt stories about animals or children could be fake, because it’s really all about the clicks and shares. Many people become accidental promoters of fake news, because they believe what they’ve read. We have been raised to trust others until they prove their self to be untrustworthy which is a good characteristic. However, the Internet social media sites are not trustworthy, because much of the information posted is fake. This is the reason I have trust issues with information posted on social media sites.
     Getting back to the main topic of, how bad are people. In my experience the people I meet on a daily basis are friendly and in some cases kind and generous. Am I just lucky? I don’t think so. I believe if you have positive expectations it will increase your chances of interacting with similar people.
      The bottom line is that I believe there are many more good people than bad. You meet them everyday, look around. “Just Saying . . . ?”

Soup - Meal or Side Dish?

     I like soup, I really do but I’m not in love with soup. Many of the women in my family love soup. I get that, it’s comfort food. But, I think of it more as a side dish, to go with a grilled sandwich. Chili and any hearty stew-like soup are different. They are a meal, not a side dish. Cornbread is the side dish in that scenario.
     My wife makes a number of different soups, all good, but her question is always the same. “Isn’t this soup delicious?” If she asked, "How do you like the soup?" That could easily be answered in a positive way.
     Her wording of the question begs a one-word answer, yes or no. Well, no is definitely the wrong answer, because the soup is good, but delicious might be a stretch. Hot apple pie with a scope of French vanilla ice cream is delicious. Do you see the predicament?
     Thin watery soup can be good, in some cases really good but delicious? So a one-word answer to that question makes you feel like your being questioned by a prosecuting attorney. Any elaboration beyond a one-word answer is unacceptable.
     “Your Honor, can you please direct to the witness to answer the question with a yes or no. An explanation is not needed or desired.”
     A detailed explanation would help prevent the following response. “No soup for you.”
     I believe the best way to enhance the flavor and enjoyment of the less hearty soups is the use of bread heels. Dipping the heels in the watery soup is the best way to drive the flavor toward delicious. But if you really want to ramp up the game have a slice of apple pie ala mode sitting next to your soup. “Just Saying . . . ?

Pie or Not

Take a look at this list and tell me which one isn’t a dessert. “Apple pie, peach pie, lemon meringue pie, pot pie, chocolate cream pie, pumpkin pie, moon pie, cherry pie, and rhubarb pie” I’ll set my watch. “Go ahead, I’ll wait. Num, num, num, num, num, num, num, num, num, num.” That’s me waiting.

            “Times up, I need your answer.” If you chose pot pie, you have my support. All the other pies on the list are desserts. Chocolate syrup, Carmel topping, and ice cream pair well with any of these pies. Pot pies are not a dessert. The toppings listed above would not enhance their flavor. I know it’s hard to believe that ice cream or chocolate wouldn’t enhance the flavor of another food, but think about it. Pot pie isn’t a dessert. Drizzling chocolate over any pot pie does a disservice to the chocolate. 

            Despite what Wikipedia may say, I believe the true origin of pot pies goes back to the days of yore when no food was wasted. Everything was thrown into a pot and cooked for hours. Some marketing guy decided if they put it in a pie crust they could call the dish, pot pie. Likely, the same guy that negotiated the deal with the Native Americans to buy Manhattan for $24. The pot pie name worked for many, but some us have not been fooled. It was the first marketing scam; maybe we’ll call it Piegate.

            Sorry if I have offended all the pot pie lovers but it’s better to know the truth. No matter how you dress up a pot pie, with lobster, shrimp, salmon, chorizo it’s still made in a pot and it’s not pie. It’s considered a comfort food but I receive no comfort from it.

            If you have chosen moon pie, I have to disagree with your choice. It’s a dessert, dipped in chocolate, well not your high-end artisanal kind, more like plastic chocolate, but it still qualifies as a dessert.

            If you selected Rhubarb pie, I can’t put up a good argument to call it a dessert. Rhubarb is a vegetable that is used as a fruit or another way of thinking about it is a vegetable that identifies as a fruit. We have all heard that phrase thrown around recently. I’m not qualified to answer whether this is truly a pie because I’ve never tried it. It’s just that Rhubarb is a harsh word and doesn’t feel like it has pie like qualities. 

            Your thoughts?

Bread Heels and Other Foibles

             I know it seems like a weird topic, but we all have odd thoughts now and then. 

I like bread heels. That’s just the way it is. I make no excuses. 

There are a lot of people that don’t. They would prefer to feed them to the birds, which is nice, but I like bread heels, so sorry birds their mine. No, not sorry, not at all. I like them enough that I think one of the big bread companies should produce a loaf with only heels. It wouldn’t be a big market, but a loyal one.

My wife is in the other camp. She’s not a fan of the heels. She won’t eat them and doesn’t even like the slice next to the heel because of its close proximity to the heel. She claims that slice has heel-like properties because of its neighbor. Those slices are mine without dispute.

I’ve seen bread sold that has no heels. How can that be? When bread is baked it has a crust on all sides, so I guess that means it was sliced off to appease all the heel haters. The birds win, but all the other heel-lovers and I lose.

When I toast bread I want it to be a crisp golden brown, but a little char is not a bad thing. My wife’s preference is tan colored toast with some white showing but absolutely no char. If there is any char at all it’s my toast.

What can I say? Opposites attract. 

* * * 

The scariest phrase in the English language is “Come here I want to show you something.”

            Not a phrase that sounds like it would send shivers down your spine. But it’s a dreaded phrase in my house and I’m sure other husbands may feel the same way when they hear those words. It’s a phrase my wife uses on occasion when she wants some supportive words from me regarding a problem she discovered. 

Never followed by, “Honey, I found some gold coins in the attic,” or “Look, I have the winning numbers in the lottery.”

     Other troubling phrases that bring me some concern include:

     “Here, taste this.” After the spoon enters my mouth I hear, “I think it’s spoiled.”

     “Taste the milk . . . it smells bad.”
                                                                            * * *
      I could go on but it’s time for breakfast.
     “ Toast would be good . . . Umm! Maybe there’s a bread heel left.”